Arguments Two

The author's for the picture on page 24 and page 1 both have the same genre of a visual argument. They use these so that one can see and feel the strong emotional appeal. The cartoon and the photograph's genre's influence their argument by narrowing their issues to a central, powerful focus of their perspective of genetically enhanced food. The picture on page 1 is stating that genetically altered foods are bad for you, but what about the people who are starving or can't afford healthier foods. And should we, who eat healthier, keep cheap and altered food away from those who need it the most? The photograph on page 24 is arguing that all people should know exactly what is going into their food because recent studies show that not all ingredients are being labeled on the ingredients section of our foods. Some of these ingredients are or could be harmful, so why would they hide it?